A.P. Moller – Maersk’s Workers Pay More in Tax than Maersk, says ITF cited CICTAR

Photo credit: ITF (Kulsoom Jafri addresses Maersk shareholders at the company’s 2022 AGM in Copenhagen on behalf of the ITF & its union affiliates)

A.P. Moller – Maersk’s employees most likely pay a higher rate of tax than the shipping giant company, International Transport Workers´ Federation says today citing information from a new analysis being released ahead of the Maersk AGM next week.

In accordance with ITF, which gave to the press a document from the Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research (CICTAR), researchers from CICTAR identify the extraordinary situation of the average worker in many countries where Maersk operates, paying a higher share of their income in tax than the Danish firm reports paying on its profits.

“Globally, Maersk pre-tax profits totalled USD $49 billion across 2021 and 2022. But in 2021 it paid just 3.7 percent tax on its profits, and only 3 percent last year. The figure includes the tax it reported as paid in the 130 countries it operates. Compare that with an average Danish worker who pays 39.1 percent income tax and social security contributions on their wages: a rate thirteen times higher than the rate paid by Maersk,” as ITF highlights in its announcement.

ITF based on the key findings of the CICTAR research, says today that a worker earning an average income in Denmark pays 13 times the rate Maersk pays, Dutch workers are paying more than 12 times the rate Maersk pays, Argentinian workers are paying more than eight times the rate of tax that Maersk pays. Also Australian workers on average pay 19.8 percent of their income in tax, more than six times Maersk’s tax rate.

Karsten Kristensen, deputy chairman of the Transport Group at Danish union 3F mentions that “Maersk is a Danish icon. And while we are proud of their commercial success, Maersk’s profits must not come at the expense of either workers or taxpayers – whether we are in Denmark or abroad.”

“Maersk’s success needs to be a shared success, both with its workers and with society. It is concerning that these new figures suggest that the company is contributing at a lower rate of tax than workers do,” Kristensen said.

Kristensen said when companies don’t pay a fair share, “It means they are expecting other taxpayers, including workers, to foot the bill for essential public services like roads and ports through income taxes. This is a clear case of corporate double standards. We believe Danes expect more from Maersk.”

Maersk did extremely well through the pandemic and the corresponding supply chain crunch. The company’s global profits jumped considerably since 2020, multiplying more than 26 times in the two-year period, according to ITF which cites information given by CICTAR.

But Danish taxpayers largely missed out on the good times. That is because, in contrast to other kinds of businesses which typically pay corporate tax rates in their home country on most or all of their profits, Maersk has paid a much lower ‘tonnage tax’ rate in home country Denmark instead, says ITF. Since 2001, instead of levying standard corporate tax on shipping companies, Denmark has levied a tonnage tax that is determined by a fixed amount per net tonne (CICTAR).

“Maersk Group’s shareholders will ask how the findings of this report fits with the company’s public commitments to sustainability,” said Kulsoom Jafri, Lead Campaigner at the International Transport Workers’​ Federation (ITF).

Kulsoom Jafri said “there was a double standard when a multinational company like Maersk was banking super profits made during the pandemic, largely due to the hard work of employees, and paying a lower rate of tax than those workers were.”

The Lead Campaigner at the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) said ITF would hand deliver its annual statement on Maersk’s ESG performance in person next week.

Disclaimer for podcasts and articles

When you view, access or otherwise use our podcasts or articles, you acknowledge the application of this disclaimer:

Shipping Telegraph ApS provides no warranty, guarantee or representation as to the accuracy or sufficiency of the information featured in our podcasts or articles. The information, opinions, recommendations, content, etc. presented in our podcasts or articles are for information purposes only and do not constitute or replace professional advice. Any reliance you may place on the information provided in our podcast or articles is strictly at your own risk.

Unless it is specifically stated, Shipping Telegraph ApS does not approve, recommend or certify any product, process, service, organization, etc. presented or mentioned in our podcasts or articles. Any third-party materials, advertisements or content of any third-party referenced in our podcasts or articles do not necessarily reflect the opinions, standard or policies of Shipping Telegraph ApS, and Shipping Telegraph ApS cannot be held accountable hereof. Shipping Telegraph ApS is not responsible or liable for the accuracy, completeness or compliance with applicable laws of any third-party material, advertisements and content.

Shipping Telegraph ApS shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions contained in the podcasts, the articles or the website used to gain access hereto and reserves the right to make changes without notice. Shipping Telegraph ApS makes no warranty that our podcasts or articles, or the server making them available, are free of viruses, worms, etc.

Shipping Telegraph ApS expressly disclaims any and all liability or responsibility for any direct, indirect, punitive, incidental, consequential or other damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with any individual's and business entity's use of, reference to, reliance on our podcasts or articles or the information presented herein. By ticking the box, I agree with the disclaimer above.